Columbia Law professor Eric Talley told Insider she was likely to take antagonistic tweets into consideration in her ruling. McCormick's ruling may have implications for serial-tweeter Musk, who has repeatedly used the platform to antagonize Twitter. (Photo by Robyn Twomey/Fortune) Accompanying the Fortune article about the PayPal mafia is a fantastic shot of the article subjects dressed as gangsters. "In an apparent effort to keep Sacks's promise to his podcast listeners, the movants created the very burden of which they now complain." Where, as here, the subpoena recipient tweets the subpoenaing attorneys the middle finger and a video of someone urinating on subpoenas, I am less bothered by it. ![]() "In other circumstances, I might view entirely duplicative subpoenas served for such tactical purposes as problematic. Sack's complaint about needing lawyers was also unnecessary, she said, and only appears to have occurred because Sack told his podcast listeners he would do so. This behavior prompted a complaint by Twitter, and was cited by McCormick as the reason the subpoena could not be quashed. Sacks initially responded to the subpoena by tweeting a picture of a middle finger from a Mad magazine cover, and posting a follow-up video from "The Wolf of Wall Street" of a character urinating on a subpoena. Sacks' lawyers said the Delaware requests from Twitter were inappropriate because they were "unduly burdensome because they were duplicative of the California subpoenas and the return dates were too soon." Sacks also complained about having to hire lawyers. ![]() Sacks, a prominent venture capitalist, had taken out a non-disclosure agreement to evaluate a potential investment in connection with Musk's acquisition of Twitter, the filing said. One of Sacks' tweets that caused his subpoena was thought to be a checklist of targets for Musk to address if and when he took control of Twitter. Musk appeared on Sacks's podcast in the middle of his takeover bid in May. Musk backed out of his $44 billion deal to buy Twitter, saying he was misled on the number of fake accounts on the platform, sparking suits and countersuits from the two parties. And now I gotta hire a lawyer to go quash this thing," the former PayPal executive said. "I have no involvement in this thing, but they sent me the broadest ever subpoena. Sacks said on his "All-In" podcast on August 5 that he had been subpoenaed by the social media platform over his comments on the Twitter acquisition, which he said was too broad. One of Elon Musk's friends subpoenaed in the Twitter acquisition lawsuit has lost an appeal to quash the request because of his behavior on Twitter and his podcast, a judge has ruled.ĭavid Sacks, the CEO of Craft Ventures and member of the " PayPal mafia", lost his appeal after being subpoenaed by Twitter for correspondence with Musk, according to court documents from Chancellor Kathleen McCormick. Sacks only hired legal counsel because he told his podcast listeners he would, the judge said. Sacks's lawyers said the subpoena was too burdensome and duplicated a previous request. ![]() Elon Musk's friend David Sacks lost a bid to quash a Twitter subpoena because of his tweets.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |